Tuesday, September 14, 2021

Gun Run from Jason Hanson, editor of Spy & Survival Briefing

                                                         


 



A while back, some of my relatives stopped by… 

 

These are relatives I actually like, not the ones I try to avoid.

 

One of these kinsfolks is a 21-year-old girl who’s looking to get her first gun for concealed carry.

 

Naturally, this topic excited me…

 

So, I took her over to my gun safe and opened it (I’m pretty sure you could hear angels singing) so she could try out different guns.

 

A few included…

 

A Sig Sauer P226

 

Smith and Wesson M&P

 

Walther Creed

 

Springfield 1911

 

Sig Sauer P250

 

Canik TP9

 

Glock 19

 

CZ 75

 

Springfield XD

 

Sig Sauer P320

 

Walther PPQ

 

After handling the guns, she’s pretty sure she’s going with the Walther Creed, which is an excellent choice. (I love the trigger on the Creed.)

 

But, here’s what I told her to do first…

 

Since she had to leave shortly, I told her to go to her local range and shoot the Creed to make sure she really loves it.

 

And, if she does, give me a call so I can get her the gun at cost and save her some money.

 

How?

 

Well, it’s my favourite way to make a little extra cash, be a little more prepared in life…

 

And, of course, to have an excuse to buy more guns for the “Hanson Family Arsenal.”

 

You won’t make a fortune with what I’m about to tell you, but I can show you how to make a little extra – $1,200 a month or more, if you so desire.

 

It does take some work – not that much – but I know the word “work” scares off anyone under 30…

 

Which is good news for people like you and me.

 

So, if you want to (legally) “gun run” for fun and profit, let me show you how I’ve done it.

 

Even if you only make an extra $500 a month, I’d say it’s still worth it.

 

But, that’s obviously for you to decide. 

 

Go here if you want to check it out.

 

It’s pretty cool and gives you access to untold amounts of guns and gear that mere mortals can’t touch.

Tuesday, September 7, 2021

Gun Controllers Collaborate with Unscrupulous Foreign Regime to Undermine U.S. Constitution ----from NRA

                                                               


      



 Last week, Brady – one of the older gun prohibition advocacy groups in the U.S. – teamed up with the government of Mexico to launch an assault against the American firearms manufacturing and distribution industry.

According to media reports, the move came in the form of a lawsuit that seeks to hold lawful and federally licensed companies in these industries responsible for the crimes of violent Mexican gangs and drug cartels, to the tune of $10 billion.

Not only that, the suit argues that the U.S. federal court in which it was filed should ignore both United States law and the Second Amendment and instead rule against the defendants under the laws of Mexico.

This breathtakingly audacious move shows not just the desperation of the gun control lobby to advance their anti-freedom agenda by any means necessary; it underscores their contempt for the uniquely American freedoms that set our country apart from the rest of the world. That Brady would ally itself with a foreign government that has become virtually synonymous with corruption proves just how detached the gun control movement has become from the values and traditions that define America. 

We have no desire to insult the decent people of Mexico, who, like the decent people of any number of U.S. cities, lead peaceful and productive lives of integrity, notwithstanding the official malfeasance and incompetence that infests the governments under which they live. We sympathize greatly with them.

Indeed, it has become commonplace for U.S. cities that allow crime to flourish and criminals to operate with virtual impunity to imperiously demand that the freedom of law-abiding Americans be infringed to compensate for their own failures. 

This is why the mayors of municipalities like Baltimore and Chicago – where even murder reliably goes unpunished – insist that the federal government must curtail citizens' Second Amendment rights in places with virtually no violent crime.  A 2018 Washington Post report – published before the more recent spike in violence in many U.S. cities – states: Some cities, such as Baltimore and Chicago, solve so few homicides that vast areas stretching for miles experience hundreds of homicides with virtually no arrests.”

Mexico, likewise, is hardly a model of law and order. The U.S. Justice Department publishes an annual Mexico Human Rights Report, the most recent edition of which, published in 2019, paints a similarly bleak picture:

Significant human rights issues included reports of the involvement by police, military, and other government officials and illegal armed groups in unlawful or arbitrary killings, forced disappearance, and torture; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions in some prisons; impunity for violence against human rights defenders and journalists; violence targeting persons with disabilities and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex persons.

Impunity for human rights abuses remained a problem, with meagre rates of prosecution for all crimes. The government’s federal statistics agency (INEGI) estimated that 94 per cent of crimes were unreported or not investigated.

Still, this regime is good enough for Brady to team up with to undermine the constitutional rights of U.S. citizens and to attack the businesses that make a robust Second Amendment possible.

Brady benefits from yet another population of unfortunate crime victims they can exploit for their own social and political agenda. And the government of Mexico gets the benefit of shifting blame for allowing a culture of violence and lawlessness to persist within its borders, with even the possibility of a payday, should they find a court with more antipathy against firearms than against endemic official vice.

Predictably, the New York Times hastened to carry water for the effort, publishing a lengthy article detailing the Mexican governments claims. However, even that piece quotes legal scholars who characterize the claims as a legal longshot and acknowledges that the current Mexican administration has done little to effectively quell violence in the country. 

The article uses the oft-cited claim that the Justice Department found that 70 per cent of the firearms submitted for tracing in Mexico between 2014 and 2018 originated in the United States.”

Of course, what the Times fails to mention is that ONLY firearms with U.S. import or manufacturing markings can be successfully traced by U.S. officials in the first place. The fact that ANY of the guns submitted for tracing werent found to have originated in the U.S. only shows that Mexican police dont understand how the U.S. tracing system works. It certainly doesnt prove that the U.S. is the only or even the primary source of crime guns in Mexico.

Furthermore, the Times also neglects to mention that many firearms of U.S. origin that end up in the hands of Mexican criminals were originally delivered to police or military forces in Mexico or in Latin America and then corruptly diverted into illegal markets and uses.

Finally, the New York Times completely ignores the fact that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives was, during the Obama administration, actively promoting the sale of U.S. firearms to suspected cartel operatives, supposedly to track the movement of the guns to criminal enterprises. Yet agents lost track of many guns before they could be recovered, resulting in their subsequent use in violent crime, including in an incident that cost the life of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. 

Ironically, Mexico already has the sorts of strict gun control laws that Brady and other firearm prohibition groups would like to see enacted in the U.S. Yet, the group ludicrously claims this merely strengthens their allegations that fault for firearm-related violence in Mexico must originate outside the country (as opposed, for example, to Mexican officials' wholesale inability or unwillingness to enforce those laws against violent criminals).

Needless to say, Americans enjoy a variety of robust rights that are shunned by foreign governments that exert a heavier hand against their own populations. It would be a crime, for example, for Bibles or other religious publications originating in America to be possessed in certain countries. Yet, no reasonable person would suggest those countries could validly demand that American courts use their authority to sanction publishers for making this material readily available in America. Likewise, the effort here by Mexico and its American collaborators is simply an attempt to impose Mexican public policy in America, contrary to the rights and traditions of the American people.   

Meanwhile, Mexico itself is a major exporter of social ills via its robust market in drugs, human trafficking, and other serious types of organized crimes, activities often abetted by Mexican government officials. That makes the combined Mexico/Brady gambit even more perverse.

The bottom line is that while Bradys effort with the Mexican government provides an excuse for agenda-driven officials and media outlets to pontificate and deflect, it will provide no relief to those suffering from crime and violence in Americas neighbour to the south. It is therefore not only frivolous but deeply cynical as well.

Friday, September 3, 2021

Camping with the family -- from Jason Hanson

 

                                                         


 


Today, I’m going camping…

 

We went camping last weekend too, but only the older kids and I are going this time.

 

The older kids wanted to leave the “babies” at home, and my wife was more than thrilled to stay home and do not have to go camping again.  

 

So, now that it’s just the older kids and me, this means I’ll have more time to test gear.

 

Whenever I buy gear, I always buy extras to have spares I can test or just to use camping in a non-emergency.

 

For instance, not that far from the campsite, we are going to is a small stream.

 

Once I get there, I will head over to that stream and scoop up some water.

 

Then, I will use some of the Israeli water purification tablets I have to purify the water.

 

Yes, I have several different ways to purify water in my Escape Bag...

 

But I haven’t used these Israeli pills in a while when camping.

 

The exact name of these tablets if you want to get some are: Taharmayim Israeli Water Purification Tablets.

 

These tablets have been used for over 20 years by the Israeli Defense Forces.

 

Each tablet will purify 1 litre of water, so you’ll need four tablets to purify a gallon of water.

 

Once you drop the tablets in the water, you should wait about 30 minutes and then you can start drinking.

 

These tablets kill all the usual nasty bacteria found in water that can make you sick.

 

You can buy these in boxes of 50, and they won’t take up hardly any space in your bug out bag or other survival kits.

 

Now, here’s the main reason I test and use my gear when I go camping…

 

Let’s say that the tablets didn’t work (I know they do), and I got sick from drinking out of the stream.

 

Well, a non-crisis situation is a good time to figure out that your gear doesn’t work and you need to get something else.

 

The first time to use your gear is not during an emergency, because what if it fails you then? (not good)

 

So, definitely consider testing some of your lifesaving gear from time to time and maybe spend a few minutes doing it this weekend.

 

Enjoy your Saturday.

Stay safe,

 

Jason Hanson

 

Former CIA Officer

 

Editor, Spy & Survival Briefing

 

Editor, Black Bag Confidential